School officials in Fort Mill defend Common Core

Special to the Fort Mill TimesMarch 4, 2014 

Chuck Epps

  • Common Core: Fact vs. Myth

    Myth: Common standards will bring state’s standards down to the lowest common denominator.

    Fact: When developing the standards, there was an agreement that no state would lower its standards.

    Judy Britt, associate professor and Elementary Education Program Coordinator at Winthrop University, said the Common Core standards provide an approach to preparing students.

    “The Common Core Standards give a universal examination of what children need to be able to do to be educated young people and ready for college,” she said. “It articulates a standard from which all schools can examine how they approach teaching.”

    Myth: The standards are not internationally bench-marked.

    Fact: International benchmarking was a huge part of developing the English-Language Arts and Math Standards. The international data referenced in the benchmarking process can be found in the college and career ready standards appendix.

    Britt said the standards aim to prepare students for the reading and writing skills they will need in college.

    Myth: The standards only include skills and do not address the importance of content knowledge.

    Fact: In ELA, the standards require certain content for all students, including global classic myths and stories, Shakespeare and foundational American Literature. The standards for mathematics focus on a foundation in whole numbers, addition, multiplication and other areas to allow students’ to learn and apply more demanding math concepts and procedures

    Britt said the standards reflect a shift in how teachers approach reading in content areas and emphasizes the importance of balancing informational text and literature.

    The standards aims to help students understand how to find the answers in the text, Britt said.

    Myth: The National Education Association (NEA) has pulled its support for Common Core

    Fact: The NEA’s website states: “NEA believes the Common Core State Standards have the potential to provide access to a complete and challenging education for all children.” A NEA poll conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research in July found that 75 percent of NEA members supported the standards outright or “with reservations.”

    However, NEA President Dennis Van Roekel recently stated in an article he wrote on Common Core that the “implementation has been completely botched” in many states.

    Britt said education officials are in the early stage of how they should implement the standards and that it is too early to determine their success. “It takes effort by all of us,” she said. “We’re all just learning about this.”

    Myth: Common Core is a federal government initiative.

    Fact: The federal government was not involved in the development of the standards. They are a state-led and driven initiative. The federal government is not implementing the standards, but is supporting states that have adopted them.

    Britt saidthe idea that it is a federal government initiative is “pure fiction based on a political rhetoric.”

    Compiled by Amanda Harris

— Parents have mixed feelings about Common Core and how it is implemented in their children’s classrooms.

Common Core academic standards were the result of an initiative of the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Teams of content specialists and educators from across the country wrote the standards, said Marty McGinn, assistant superintendent for the Fort Mill School District. They were developed based on feedback from states, teachers, researchers, college and universities, parents and others invested in education, she said.

The standards are used by individual districts to form a curriculum.

“We own the curriculum,” McGinn said.

The concept is intended to create a unified, national standard that will better position students for college and post-secondary success. Detractors say its wrests control from school boards and administrators.

A bill making its way through the S.C. Senate Education Committee would require a review of math and reading standards by 2018 and legislative approval for future changes to curriculum in public schools. The bill replaced a measure that sought to repeal the standards.

McGinn said the Fort Mill School District works with teachers to develop strategies to meet the Common Core standards. While some parents expressed concern about the assessment of the standards at a recent school board meeting – as well as at private meetings and a public forum last week – McGinn said she has received positive feedback from parents and teachers. about the new standards and instructional changes.

“A lot of the teachers are energized as they work on implementation. We are excited too,” she said, emphasizing the cooperation between teachers and the central office.

McGinn said based on feedback she’s getting from parents, the curriculum is on the right track.

“Parents feel like their children are being challenged and learning things will need in the future,” she said.

Chuck Epps, superintendent of the Fort Mill School District, said the standards help prepare students for a world increasingly driven by new technology and provides them the tools to enter the work force or higher education.

“It’s an economic development issue for us,” Epps said.

In a follow-up email, he explained why:

“We are being told by employers that they want students who can display higher level thinking and problem solving abilities. We will not be able to attract higher paying skilled jobs to SC unless we have a ready workforce. This initiative is simply an effort to connect the dots between a better educated workforce prepared to accept higher skilled employment leading to a more prosperous quality of life for future South Carolinians,” Epps wrote.

Specialists and educators from across the country wrote the standards. There were multiple rounds of feedback from states, teachers, researchers, higher education, and the public.

Kelly McKinney, media and communications officer for the Fort Mill School District, said she has seen the benefit Common Core has brought to the classrooms.

“Teachers I have talked to are energized by the standards and what they are teaching the children,” she said.

Sugar Creek Elementary’s Amber Smith, who has been teaching for 15 years, said learning a new set of standards is nothing new in her profession and that teachers still have the freedom to make instructional decisions.

“The basic idea of what a ‘standard’ is hasn’t changed,” she said, and that with any new standard, there is a learning process.

“There has been a lot of communication across elementary schools,” Smith said. “There are resources available to us.”

Smith said she is happy to answer questions from parents.

Vaidehi Patel, a member of the Gold Hill Elementary PTA, said she is concerned the standards are doing more harm than good, especially when it comes to her son’s math progress.

“I think Common Core is not making them smart, but are making them confused,” she said. “I am worried about how in the long term it might harm our children.”

Susan Certo, whose son is a seventh-grader at Gold Hill Middle School, said she fears the standards force federal control of local schools.

“Common Core changes everything about school except the buildings, lunches and buses,” she said. “The standards drive the curriculum.”

Certo said many parents did not know about the Common Core standards, adopted by South Carolina in 2010, until this year.

“Parents are finally waking up to it,” she said. “I’m very passionate about this issue. I think Common Core is bad for our state and our nation.”

Parents also shared their concerns and heard from both sides of the Common Core debate during a Feb. 24 forum held in Rock Hill. Clover School District’s Assistant Superintendent Shelia Quinn and Judy Mobley, executive director of secondary education for the Rock Hill School District, spoke in favor of the Common Core.

American Principles Project’s Jane Robbins and South Carolina Parents Involved in Education President Sheri Few presented their opposition to the standards. Few is a candidate for S.C. Superintendent of Education.

Quinn, who said she was speaking as both an educator and a parent, said the standards were designed by a team of experts in the fields of math and literacy and do not dictate what is taught in schools.

“There is a big difference between standards and the curriculum,” she said.

Those opposed argued the curriculum is designed to teach students what they need for the test, which is based on Common Core standards.

“The test drives what is taught in the classroom,” Few said.

The Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service