With the tenure of L.A. Unified School District Superintendent John Deasy in doubt, school officials across the United States say they already have learned one major lesson from the city’s botched iPad rollout: Classroom technology is here to stay, but it is important to choose wisely.
“There are recipes for success out there, and there are recipes for failure,” said Lenny Schad, chief technology officer at the Houston Independent School District. “There is such a risk. Every failure – we all pay for it.”
Los Angeles’ well-publicized $1.3 billion fumbled attempt to provide every child with an iPad gave educators pause at a time when many school districts are spending big on laptops and tablets, convinced that public schools must incorporate the latest technology into classrooms. The conversation has shifted from “why” to “how,” as superintendents swap plans, ideas and best practices so they can learn from L.A’s mistakes and be smarter about implementing technology in their own schools.
A month after school officials began handing out iPads last fall, the district backtracked, taking the devices back after a cascade of problems, including missing iPads, security issues and questions about the price and the bidding process that are now being reviewed by the district’s inspector general. In August, the school district relaunched bidding for the devices and suspended new purchases under the iPad program.
Digital Access for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
The increased discussion and cooperation among school leaders comes as the federal government is earmarking billions toward updating infrastructure for high-speed Internet access.
School officials must be tech savvy, even in areas where Internet access is slow and not all students can afford computers at home. They also must stay one step ahead of the digital natives who are capable of navigating high-tech tools with ease. And they are all too well aware of what happened when L.A. students figured out how to get around blocks meant to keep them out of popular social networks and non-educational sites.
“Deasy would acknowledge that he hit real bumps in the road trying to work through the challenges,” said Frederick Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington-based think tank. “How you actually do that in a cost-effective way and make sure the technology is used well in classrooms is a huge challenge.”
Those questions remain in Los Angeles, where Deasy and the board have clashed repeatedly and where an inspector general is investigating the procurement process for the iPads along with looking into ties among Deasy, board members and technology giants Pearson and Apple Inc.
The L.A. school board met Tuesday night behind closed doors but emerged without discussing Deasy’s upcoming performance evaluation, which is set for Tuesday. Deasy was not at the meeting.
Elsewhere, some district leaders say they have been able to plan for – and work through – challenges to technology rollouts, even without specific evidence that these devices can improve educational outcomes.
Houston Independent School District, the eighth largest in the country, is launching a computer program to give each student a device. Rather than supply the schools all at once, the district opted to deliver the technology over time. Houston relied on help from mentor teachers and leaders by partnering with Mooresville, a small district in North Carolina that has developed a reputation as a technology leader.
Leaders from Houston and Mooresville helped create a new version of a toolkit for superintendents, now available from The Consortium for School Networking and the School Superintendents Association. The guide encourages leaders to take a clear-eyed look before charging ahead to make an expensive and complex purchase.
“Too often with technology it’s been a hero mentality,” said Keith R. Krueger, CEO of the Consortium for School Networking, a nonprofit that assists K-12 school districts with learning about new technology. “Early adopters play a critical role, we can learn from it, and superintendents are a linchpin.”
Other school leaders acknowledge the urgency of seeking advice early and often from the target audience – teachers, students and parents – so they have a say in shaping the process.
For example, at the Liberty Public Schools just north of Kansas City, Mo., the district asked teachers to use tablet computers with different operating systems so they could compare features beyond technical specifications and the price. One elementary school in the district launched a program with tablet computers that has been popular with parents who applied via a lottery. Teachers are also being taught to use technology, said Liberty’s superintendent, M. Jeremy Tucker.
“Along the way we have to stress the analogy of a marathon,” Tucker said. “Some start at the starting line, some do not. We space it out along the way. Teachers will be in different places in implementation.”
In Texas, McAllen Independent School District Superintendent James Ponce said he did not know the outcome when he initiated a plan to give every child an iPad. Part of making the leap to a new way of doing things meant taking calculated risks, he said, and part of the success was creating an environment where teachers had freedom to experiment.
“It wasn’t like: Here’s a miracle tool, it will help you engage,” Ponce said. “We were wanting to put it in the hands of all our children and allow it to be more organic. . . . It was like: If we don’t wait, and we don’t have all the answers, so what? What do we have to lose?”
The decision to buy tablets, rather than desktops, was motivated by observations that students are more likely to use mobile devices. At the time, the iPad emerged as the best option. (There are now more choices for districts as new devices and companies compete for a slice of a growing digital education market.)
Desktop computers had been used about six hours a day; tablets are already getting more than double the use. Ponce said the tablets are nurturing exploration and curiosity in children.
“We bet on kids being very responsible with one of the most powerful tools that we could offer,” Ponce said “We also bet on teachers knowing that they were going to create digital environments. . . . We really stayed on the side of creativity and innovation.”
Waiting too long would have kept computers out of the hands of children in McAllen, a city near the Mexican border, where many families are poor and can’t afford to spend money on technology.
Ponce recalls the reaction of one father, who stopped to thank him for the tablet his child received. The family could not have afforded it on their own.
“At that point I realized it wasn’t an investment in technology, it was an investment in children,” Ponce said. “This isn’t like a technology issue. It’s more of a kid issue.”
Brenda Iasevoli of The Hechinger Report contributed to this story