Hillary Clinton ended much of the suspense about what she’s running on, delivering her first full campaign-style stump speech on New York’s Roosevelt Island on Saturday. The result was a platform of workmanlike liberal policy that neither mimics her husband’s agenda nor fully dignifies the populists pushing the Democratic Party from the country’s ideological governing space. America’s center-left has a champion.
Clothed in rhetoric condemning economic and social inequality, Clinton’s address acknowledged the power of the Obama coalition of young and minority voters, striking a very different note from the triangulated social conservatism of her husband’s presidency. She promised to help pretty much everyone except Republican presidential candidates and hedge-fund managers, arguing that the country needs an “inclusive economy” supported by an “inclusive society.” She proposed laws barring discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, backed universal preschool and child care, supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants with clean records, demanded easier access to the polls and endorsed a constitutional amendment re-imposing restrictions on political spending.
In one of the best lines in her speech, Clinton mocked the cowardice of Republicans who dodge reporters’ questions on climate change. “They'll say, ‘I’m not a scientist,’” she said. “Well, then why don’t they start listening to those who are?”
In one of the worst lines in her speech, Clinton again punted on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, bowing to progressives’ current anti-trade hysteria. “Advances in technology and the rise of global trade have created whole new areas of economic activity and opened new markets for our exports,” she said, “but they have also displaced jobs and undercut wages for millions of Americans.”
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Herald
But, thankfully, Clinton also avoided some of the worst populist excesses of the Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party. Crucially, Clinton emphasized the importance of economic growth, innovation and efficient government, not rigid regulatory and tax policies or unaffordable expansions of entitlements. Clinton appears to be aligning herself with Democrats who stress the importance of economic competitiveness and flexibility in enabling the country to keep up with global competition and advance the standard of living.
Stromberg is a member of The Washington Post’s editorial page staff.