South Carolina

Pipeline poses problems for S.C. residents

Savannah Riverkeeper Tonya Bonitatibus opposes  a petroleum pipeline that would cross the Savannah River near Jackson. She is finding allies in property owners whose land could be taken for the project.
Savannah Riverkeeper Tonya Bonitatibus opposes a petroleum pipeline that would cross the Savannah River near Jackson. She is finding allies in property owners whose land could be taken for the project.

When news broke that a Georgia agency had stopped a regional petroleum pipeline this week, Savannah Riverkeeper staff members hugged and cheered.

They had spent months organizing community opposition to the $1 billion project from South Carolina’s Upstate to Jacksonville, Fla. Pipeline opponents were elated that the Georgia Department of Transportation found no public need for the 360-mile pipe.

But the battle isn’t over. The Kinder Morgan company is preparing to appeal the decision. And those tracking the pipeline dispute say South Carolina property owners should pay particular attention to the company’s plans.

South Carolina apparently doesn’t provide the same private property rights protections as Georgia when pipeline companies come calling. For that reason, energy companies could more easily acquire land for petroleum pipelines in the Palmetto State than across the Savannah River in Georgia, critics of the pipeline say.

Unlike in Georgia, South Carolina law does not require the state Department of Transportation to sign off on a company’s petroleum pipeline before project developers move to condemn property along the route, said Kinder Morgan opponents and Transportation Department spokesman Pete Poore. Dukes Scott, director of the S.C. Office of Regulatory Staff, said he also is unaware of any authority his agency or the state Public Service Commission has for interstate oil pipelines.

“I don’t think South Carolinians quite get that they are not protected,” Savannah Riverkeeper Tonya Bonitatibus said as she stood last week at an Aiken County boat ramp where the pipe would cross the river.

Kinder Morgan’s “Palmetto Pipeline” would cross six South Carolina counties as well as the Sumter National Forest. It would extend through parts of Anderson, Abbeville, Greenwood, McCormick, Edgefield and Aiken counties before running into Georgia near Jackson, S.C. It would then go through south Georgia to Jacksonville, Fla. The Kinder Morgan pipeline would be a long spur from a main petroleum pipeline that runs from the Gulf Coast through a terminal in the Anderson County community of Belton.

Bonitatibus, like many, is fighting the pipeline because of the potential damage a spill could have on the Savannah River, which already is under stress from mercury pollution, industrial discharges and radioactive contamination. But she’s found allies in the people whose land would be used along the route.

Landowners in Georgia have been particularly vocal, but South Carolina property owners are starting to look more closely at the proposal, worried that their land could be acquired for the project against their will. Several hundred people showed up at a meeting Thursday night in North Augusta to voice concerns to Kinder Morgan about the proposal.

Judith Haskell McCarthy, 70, said her family has generously provided access through its land for power lines, water pipes and roads over the years.

But granting approval for a Kinder Morgan pipeline isn’t in the family’s interests because she and her sisters want to sell the property, she said. If Kinder Morgan runs a pipeline through their property near North Augusta, it would make the land harder to market, she said.

“It’s a scar,” McCarthy said. “Every scar, whether they realize it or not, hurts and devalues your property.”

Under federal law, the government can acquire property through the use of “eminent domain.” This power typically allows governments to condemn private land for public uses, such as for roads, as long as they compensate the property owner. That can occur through easements, which let landowners keep the property but requires them to allow access. Or it can mean the acquisition of the land.

In this case, however, a private pipeline company would use that power, Atlanta environmental lawyer Steve Caley said. Private petroleum pipeline companies received that authority in many Southern states at about the time of World War II, said Caley, who is with the nonprofit legal service GreenLaw. But in Georgia, landowners receive an extra layer of protection.

Georgia’s law says a private pipeline company must show the Transportation Department that its project serves a public need or purpose before it can condemn land. Last week, with gas prices stable and supplies abundant, the Georgia DOT said it could not find a public need for the Kinder Morgan pipeline.

Kinder Morgan is assessing the ruling. The company said it rarely takes land for pipeline projects, instead preferring to negotiate with landowners. When it does condemn property, it will pay fair compensation, the company says.

“Eminent domain is rarely used on projects such as this (less than 1 percent) and only as a last resort,” company spokeswoman Melissa Ruiz said in an email. “And in those rare instances where eminent domain is used, the landowner is awarded full compensation for the limited use of his or her property by an independent tribunal.”

Few people seem convinced, including some state lawmakers.

Aiken County legislators have asked Attorney General Alan Wilson for an opinion on what rights pipeline companies have to condemn land in South Carolina. Draft legislation also is being prepared that could be introduced in South Carolina.

A pipeline from Belton to Jackson in South Carolina would still need state and federal environmental permits, including approval to disturb wetlands as well as permission to cross public roads. But the lack of state protection for private property rights is a concern, state Rep. Bill Hixon said.

“This is America,” Hixon, R-Aiken, said. “For somebody to just come in and take your land – it’s not supposed to work that way.”