Kyle Busch, winner of five of the past seven Sprint Cup Series races, was asked Friday if drivers should qualify for the Chase on a single victory.
Busch was emphatic in his reply.
“I think winning in this sport is very, very tough and you see that every single year,” Busch said. “I think the average is only between 12 and 14 winners in a season and it’s been that way for 15 or 20 years.”
Busch represents a view that was widely held among NASCAR drivers before the Chase scoring system: That winning a race didn’t count for enough in the grand scheme. The old system was about consistency, where an abundance of top-10 finishes could trump winning a race or two.
The Chase rewards that single victory, even if it comes from an unexpected driver in one of the circuit’s two road-course races, or at the superspeedways in Daytona and Talladega, where winners can be unpredictable.
Sometimes you look at teams – maybe last year you look at Aric Almirola or AJ Allmendinger – they won races to get themselves into the Chase, but were their teams really ready for the Chase?
Driver Kyle Busch, on NASCAR’s win-and-you’re-in format
“Sometimes you look at teams – maybe last year you look at Aric Almirola or AJ Allmendinger – they won races to get themselves into the Chase, but were their teams really ready for the Chase?” Busch asked. “That’s not for any of us to decide. It’s for them to have to be able to compete ... for a championship.”
Almirola’s win to get in came at Daytona. Allmendinger’s? At Watkins Glen, the road course where NASCAR’s Cheez-It 355 is scheduled for Sunday.
They wouldn’t have been locks under the old system, when it was conceivable (though unlikely) a driver could score enough top-10 finishes to make the Chase, and win the championship, without ever winning a race.
NASCAR restructured the rules 12 seasons ago to reset the points with 10 races to go, setting up a 10-race showdown among Chase qualifiers. They tweaked those rules again before the 2014 season so that if a driver won a race they would almost certainly be in the Chase.
That meant a driver such as Allmendinger, with a smaller team such as JTG-Daughtry Racing, could win a road race and end up in the post-season along with teams from NASCAR giants such as Hendrick Motorsports, Roush Racing, Joe Gibbs Racing teams and Team Penske.
Ready or not.
Pluses and minuses
Jeff Gordon, nearing the end of a 24-year driving career, has seen a lot of stock-car racing. He has won four championships in what’s now called Sprint Cup, plus 92 races and 80 poles. He spent enough time under both scoring systems to compare and contrast.
And he sees good and bad in each.
He values the consistency and versatility that was demanded of drivers in the ’90s. Those rules forced him to learn nuances to driving road courses (Watkins Glen and Sonoma) and Superspeedways (Daytona and Talladega)
But the more recent system the championship won’t be decided until the season-ending race at Homestead, Fla. Too often under the old system the championship was decided a month, or even two months, before the finale.
It got boring toward the end of the year a lot of years.
Driver Jeff Gordon, on NASCAR’s points system before the Chase
“Early on I just remembered wanting to take on every challenge as a team that we possible could to improve to be a bigger threat for the championship,” Gordon said. “I enjoyed it, even though I didn’t grow up road-racing a lot.”
Now, if you win a race on the typical, 1 1/2-mile track NASCAR employs, you don’t have to worry about results at road courses or Superspeedways – what Gordon calls the “wild-card tracks.”
“Once you get a win or two under your belt, you start thinking about what you have to do in those 10 (season-ending Chase) races,” Gordon said. “You can give up a lot of things. You can go-for-broke and go all-out and try new things and get super-aggressive.”
Gordon doesn’t see that as a bad thing: He noted that when the old system was in place “it got boring toward the end of the year a lot of years.”
That’s not an exaggeration.
A different drama
Numbers illustrate Gordon’s perception. In the last 10 years of the former system, the driver leading the points race with 10 races to go won the title eight times.
In the 11 seasons under the Chase system, the driver with the lead with 10 races to go has won it twice (Tony Stewart in 2005 and Jimmie Johnson in 2007).
Gordon is right that the old system demanded drivers be good at all varieties of Sprint Cup tracks. He’s just as correct that NASCAR had a problem when its championship became a coronation.
8 Times in the final 10 seasons of the old points system the driver with the lead with 10 races to go won the championship.
2 Times in 11 seasons under the Chase format the Champion has been the driver leading the points with 10 races to go.
Now it’s win to get in, and peak at the right time.
But to get in with one victory and have a chance to run for a championship? Even on a wild-card track such as Watkins Glen?
Allmendinger could do that again Sunday. He won the pole for the Cheez-it 355 on Saturday, with a lap of 68.993 seconds (127.839 mph).
“I’ve always loved road courses. I feel like drivers can make more of a difference here,” Allmendinger said. “Last year winning the race gave us great confidence. It’s the same car as last year, but we worked all winter to make it lighter.”
The pole is Allmendinger’s second of the season. The other was at Sonoma, Calif., the other road course on the Sprint Cup schedule.
He finished 37th.
Era of uncertainty
One thing the Chase Era of NASCAR Sprint Cup racing has done is throw open the title chances to a much wider field. In the final 10 years of the old format, the driver leading the points with 10 races to go won the title eight times.
Points leader 10 races to go
Previous points system
Points leader 10 races to go